Look at today's pattern. I did not change anything from yesterday's chart (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjLNuXnMUaGCItHGxBbgiJq2KiU4hS_D82YZ_BXodIUvp17h-989IovFdHXyqw6aBIawjmA8p4pTWK57aKw91oApZkIAoaP69eOddEkkQvtTbkGOXtjD6n2uu3Imli-WHyKzIGWFNc7u70/s1600-h/spx-7-28.jpg) except for the inclusion of the red abc labels and I moved where I thought subwave b should be for the triangle. These changes were made when I highlighted the line graph, which made things look a little clearer.
Notice when comparing both charts how the projection (my red lines) for wave e almost played out to a tee? As choppy as the waves were today and the numerous questions about the pattern, I will have to say my triangle count for wave iv is still in play.
We even had a falling wedge/contracting triangle breakout at the close. This lines up well with the conclusion of wave e of the triangle with the final thrust up to complete minute v.
In fact, in EW Principle, pg 49 on triangles, states that "Wave E can undershoot or overshoot the A-C line, and in fact, our experience tells us that it happens more often than not."
I honestly was concerned when price for what I believed to be wave e violated the A-C line but now find solace in this statement from the book.
What an interesting day it has been.
No comments:
Post a Comment