[9:05PM Update]
Here's a chart using the Simple Moving Average. A nice 38% retrace from the current level will target approximately the 50 day SMA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a long post. I hope one takes the time to read through it though.
I realize I have used reverse Fibonacci techniques previously but did not realize it at first. Unfortunately, not all projections panned out.
See here for previous posts.
So given that, I would not give yesterday's post, "REVERSE FIBONACCI, FIBONACCI EXTENSION & LONG TERM RESISTANCE " too much credence. As I said in that post there are no guarantees but certainly something to be mindful of.
I like what
Kenny is doing now. He is challenging and questioning where we are and is going back to the basics. I agree with him completely.
For those who follow
Daneric, there was once a poster named Wags who had much to share (and it was quite simple) . I believe Wags' message was the most useful thing for novices (trade the trend and watch the moving averages) out there but the method in which he delivered his message fell on deaf ears.
The two charts above somewhat highlights what good ole Wags (if ur still out there Wags, correct me if I'm wrong) was talking about. Many who disputed him claimed that trend trading was too slow because of the lagging nature of the indicator. I say so what? The two charts above should be reason enough to believe that one could have made a good chunk of change trading/investing the MAs.
I like counting waves period. There is something about the principle and Fibonacci that intrigues me. I think it is useful and I do believe you can trade with it. (
See previous posts on this). However, I am not saying it is an end-all-be-all tool, but yet another tool on the tool belt.
With the charts above though I placed some comments (especially the second chart) where I have learned that perhaps trading and counting corrective waves should take a back seat to the moving averages.
Trade the trend and if challenged with a questionable wave count, give more weight to a count that goes with the trend. In my posts,
"A Road To SPX 1228", I began to post on this. I believe it was the weekly MACD bull cross that first caught my eye on this potential among other reasons.
Many will say these EW bloggers are capitulating as we start to turn more bullish. I won't say that is what I truly believe at the moment, but I have to at least address this issue and share some lessons from the past.
I still find that many folks are bearish and I don't know if it is just cheerleading a short position or hoping for something they believe to be right but I see the heavy emotion in the chat rooms. Some appear to be trapped in their positions and I don't know if that is what is preventing them from seeing something that is and has been obvious for sometime now. (Unfortunately I believe that is a product of not having a proper risk management strategy and stop-loss exit point).
I am not short/caught in a short position at the moment but I do blame myself for not heeding what I'm posting about much sooner. Hey, live and learn.
I believe Pug, of
PUG Stock Market Analysis , was the only person (at least the only person I was aware of in the EW community) who went bullish early on. Heck, when Pug was pushing his bullish counts and to see many ridicule him, that should've been a contrarian indicator. Kudos to you Pug!
You can call this post a bearish capitualtion but the trend still says up. Let's face it we can't predict the future, let alone find the tops or bottoms. The only that is good for is our egos and nothing more.
Do I still believe we may see a pullback in store? Absolutely, but I'm not quite sure it will be "the one" everyone has been waiting for.
I have posted a few times and commented in the chat rooms that I'm still waiting for a minute degree impulse wave down along with the associated moving average cross-overs to believe that a much larger turn is coming.
Until then, watch out for the dip buyers.